POLL: How do you feel about the Valkyrie changes?

Who cares if Valk is used by 100% of people on invades? I never see her on defence so whats the problem?

You call 12-15 hours in Explore mode killing easy teams every 30 seconds fun?

Overpowered my ass. She is the weakest converter. The fact there are plenty of blue troops is secondary.

1 Like

im unhappy about valk loosing necro only couse we got basically no mana transformers who got necro now

(kos doesnt count, it gives no mana and i dont feel like making a skull deck)

hard to find any synergy at all

3 Likes

Thank you for instantly understanding the problem. No viable options. Just left in the desert to rot.

“I’m cold ted and I wanna go home. Let me go home.”

2 Likes

[quote=“ogunther, post:234, topic:14368, full:true”]They simply made the game less enjoyable which is always, always a piss poor design decision. Why make your game less enjoyable when you have an opportunity to make it more enjoyable? And don’t try to sell me a bad of goods by saying the game is more enjoyable now; it’s not.
[/quote]

This is your opinion and a HIGHLY subjective one at that. It’s also a blatant attempt to pre-empt any further discussion by dismissing dissenting opinions outright. We all know you’re better than that.

Oh come on maqe. You think using those deadweight troops against sitting duck explore mode is enjoyable?

1 Like

OF COURSE IT WOULD BE.

If you’d read back through the thread, you’d even say that I’ve already said that.

It comes down to the fact that they changed it. We can’t do anything about it, other than keep playing or not.

1 Like

Fun? If you want an abundance of arcane traitstones, it’s NECESSARY. Just like it’s now necessary to get souls some other way than blazing through PVP.

1 Like

To be fair, the only official explanation we’ve received is that Valkyrie was being used too much.

The devs clearly felt that nerfing her soul gain is the way to fix that. In my opinion, it’s at least better than the alternative (nerfing her viability at generating mana, increasing her spell cost, removing Water Link). Mechanically, she’s as viable as ever. If they’d have changed that instead of nerfing her soul output – oh boy, you think the forums are on fire now

6 Likes

Let’s go Ogunther and Robert, we’re out of here. Time to go have fun with some like-minded individuals. Auto Bots roll out!


3 Likes

No viable options?

I’ve earned 4000 souls in the last 24 hours, about the same as before. You’re speaking pure hyperbole.

There are plenty of viable options, you just don’t like any of them. Be honest.

1 Like

Yeah that is fully agreeable. Thank god they didn’t make her completely useless. We’re just sad they didn’t give us any good alternatives.

2 Likes

Never said it was. But I do it because I want arcane traitstones. Now souls fall into the same category.

It’s a FTP game, sometimes it’s going to be a grind.

Where did you earn them at sucka, EXPLORE? pfft.

Now see, on this we agree. It isn’t that hard to just be honest.

A combination of Explore and PVP, just like before she was changed.

Id rather enjoy my time with the game then go down the road of using junk out of necessity… to be honest.

So what it really comes down to is you don’t agree with the devs but feel like you can’t do anything about it and thus want to convince everyone else they’re powerless, too? Thanks but no thanks. I stand up for myself and voice my opinion when I feel it is valid. If you want to just roll over and show your belly every time something happens to you, that’s your choice but don’t expect me to join you in your apathy.

1 Like

Im out

5 Likes

the way they allocated necromancy basically makes any deck with them slower, and also made most of decks slower (souls/time) in comparison to pre-nerf

a nerf which makes me spend more time for the same gain is a valid reason to be displeased about - in my opinion - at least in this case where i think pre-nerf we werent getting too many souls/time and that number didnt have to be nerfed

No not at all. ALL viewpoints are worth hearing, whether or not we agree with them.

What it really comes down to is that we are all here because we like to play this game. This is a discussion board and the game is worth discussing.

I’ve never once told you your opinion isn’t valid. I just don’t agree with it. That’s the basis of a discussion, is it not? I’m not trying to change anybody’s mind at all, just trying to offer an alternative point of view. Eventually, we’ll all reach a common ground and move on, just like we did with the dozens of nerfs that came before this one.

And make no mistake about it, I’m not apathetic. If I were, I wouldn’t be spending my time arguing with you guys. :wink:

1 Like