As Title says with 3.5 this needs to be removed ASAP
Please Devs look into this.
27 Likes
The technology to make this feat possible just isnāt there right now, Iām afraid.
4 Likes
The new class system makes this cost egregiously offensive, I agree. The fact that the update was released with the class change cost unaddressed is kiiiiinda a major failure on the devsā part. Oh well.
Crossing my fingers to see this handled ASAP.
9 Likes
It should take 5 seconds to change the 50-gems fee in a 0-gem feeā¦
5 Likes
The devs have said that touching any part of the class change fee requires rewriting very old code and could possibly break the game. Yes, even changing the number. I call BS, becauseā¦wellā¦come onā¦but *shrug* what do I know?
2 Likes
Change 50 gems for 1 gem, broke the game ? Lol ?
2 Likes
The devs always avoid the discussion about changing the value of the fee. They always explained that removing the fee is difficult.
As said, changing the fee is like changing a number in a text file. Save it. And thatās all.
6 Likes
Oh god.
I hadnāt even thought about this.
Wow.
Come on devsā¦
Switch it to 1 free swap a day, then 50 gems per (which is obsurd on its own level).
I feel like taking the gem fee away would definitely NOT break the game. But whatevs, Iām not a computer expertā¦and it still sounds like an amazingly lame excuse.
2 Likes
I totally agree, the sooner the betterā¦
Right, that the technology wouldnāt be there is rubbishā¦
Paywall.
Itāll never be removed.
You are so rightā¦ 
Small indie company, etc
Based on Avoidance, and lack of action well over a year, or occasional use of the word ādifficultā to change. One can surmise that the 50 Gem fee is a dictate or mandate from the publisher, And the developers need permission to alter it.
Anything economy based must be run by them for approval. Legally they just can change a text file w/o authorization.
This is what everyoneās thinking but no oneās saying aloud.
The long arm that is the irrational greed of the publisher seems like itās playing a hand in this refusal to change a player-hostile feature, but until they come clean with the reality of it, who knows?
4 Likes
But, maybe they lost the source code and only have the executable AND a run time cyclic redundancy check is done on the executable.
Yeah, that must be the reason.
As salty herself pointed out in another post. They already changed class change from once a week to once a day. This is after dev stream they constantly deflect to when asked. Point being they already did it once. Iām not buying its too hard to code. Mostly since all they will say is āwe covered it in a stream alreadyā. Itās justā¦ Look you did once, itās not mission impossible. If you want it in game just say so. Said stream they keep saying they talked about extensively barely got a paragraph on the issue. Can be summed up with ātoo hard. Moving alongā
Just change it 
6 Likes
Guild Wars is gunna be a nightmare next week. I want to use hero on defense and attack. When Iām doing my battles my defense will be wrong class plus have to pay 50 damn gems.
2 Likes
It already felt dumb, now it feels dumber. If weāre supposed to explore the options of the Hero class it shouldnāt cost us resources to do so.
3 Likes