Players that are you, no doubt. I can even guess what you use by what nerves you carefully don’t advocate.
Anyway no, a lot of middle level and flawed cards are still used, but perhaps not at end-game, where all defenses being the same old, same old they require the same old, same old attack teams.
I understand that a new powerful card, one available even to low-level plebes, is distasteful to you.
Of course, no ‘unbeatable’ troop can win all alone. The other cards are there for a reason, unless you think the ideal team is Faminex4. Many do, and that is a nerf that’s sorely needed. One Mythic per team, would you agree?
So: do you think that old overpowered cards such as Famine and Mab and FG should be nerfed specifically in order to not form unbeatable teams?
Or if Fizzbang should be nerfed because OMG too explodey, then Ragnarok should go first?
And why do you think a leveled playfield where all card are more or less the same would be more enjoyable?