This is not a call out... just a screen shot from pvp

Truth nothing but truth

1 Like

Besides Gems Of War I play another game every now and then that is online for 13 years already, with no MTAs or DLCs. So whereā€™s the problem with 17 years?

The rest? TLDR ā€¦

Omg dude congrats youā€™ve got one game thatā€™s 13 not 17 years old.

Well done, Iā€™m completely wrong your right. Even tho youā€™ve mentioned one game thatā€™s not 17 years .

Your evidence has stumped me :joy:

Considering on-going games as a general concept started less than 20 years agoā€¦ any game thats past the 10 year mark kind of proves the point they can last as long there is an interest in them.

Again your evidence of listing hundreds of 17 year old games still getting played has confounded me.

Thankyou for your immaculate evidence.
Iv changed my mind :wink:

I was just asking sincerely, why 17 years seem to be too much, when other games are close to that time span as well?!

world of warcraft has been going on for 19 years at this point, does it seem like its about to die off?

Iā€™m going by the evidence tbh.

Facts of how many 17 year old games are still getting played.

If you think thereā€™s lots , then list them and il Google your evidence.

Donā€™t just assume.

Thatā€™s one.

Out of letā€™s be reasonable 10000 games made in the last 17 years.

So you have one.

Btw. Still waiting on your monster journey team dude, or can you admit your wrong.

Jesus and I just missed why when the PVP system is dug is not divided even according to the level, so that it is fair and it will degenerate almost to the beginning of PC games.

i answered that question: if you are going for leaderboard spots, in what world would you choose to farm in the monster region? If going for a leaderboard spot, you would choose a region where you CAN use a journey team, because that is how you would maximize VP per hour. You dont NEED a monster team, because it would be inefficient for the purpose you are grinding.

1 Like

I do also want to point out. World of warcraft is a triple A well financed game.

Not a startup f2p mobile game.

So a weeny but different.

But il let you have one game over 17 years old.

Just a few long running games that are still online:

-The Realm (1996)
-SubSpace (1997)
-Ultima Online (1997)
-Final Fantasy 11 (2002)
-EverQuest (1999)
-Anarchy Online (2001)
-Tibia (1997)
-RuneScape (2001)
-Nexus: The Kingdom of the Winds (1996)
-Counter-Strike 1.6 (1999/2000)

Peace. Out.

Ok so Iā€™m not grinding for leaderboard as thereā€™s no point.

Also if your going for speed, your picking the 1st battle so less vps.

This will calm down when the mass delusion of books and maxing kingdoms is over.

Then you will get leaderboard pal.

How many are f2p mobile games.

And are all them games the original that are still getting updates.

Do you know before I check myself :grin:

Omg the realm was made in 1996.

But was offline till 2018 seriously dude.
Iv checked one , thatā€™s enough to tell me you didnā€™t check your evidence.

all 3 of the fights given to me will be within 1 or 2 seconds of each other, and the bonus VP is literally MORE than the base VP for higher level players. Speed is not the only thing to measure with fights now, you NEED to use slightly slower teams (journey troops) to maximize the VP. getting an extra 29-32 VP per fight on average more than makes up for it, especially for those over level 2000.

If you donā€™t care about the leaderboard spots then why are you so intent on voicing your opinion on it? if it doesnā€™t affect you at all, then why do you care?

This affects me in a positive way, i got 6th on the global leaderboard last week simply because i was leveling classes in PvP, i didnt even play that hard. I saw quite a few people below me with nearly double the number of battles i did. There is effectively ZERO difference between me (~1500) and anyone above me. Single digit health/armor differences literally do not make up for that variance. And even though it affects me positively i can see how this is unfair and needs to be changed.

Anyway this has changed into something else.

So strange, so il stop as Iā€™m the bigger person.

To the Devs, PvP is fine, and all the nay sayers will calm down soon.

Well-done giving lowers players a helping hand, being fair is better than the highest getting everything with there.

(Well iv been here longer so I deserve everything ). Lmfao

No one is saying this on this thread.
There is an imbalance in the way points are rewarded to high level players. This is the problem.

1 Like


:shushing_face: