I think that would work well for the Leaderboard .
How would you handle the situations where a guild unlocks a reward stage, but then has a player leave, taking them back below the required total?
I think that would work well for the Leaderboard .
How would you handle the situations where a guild unlocks a reward stage, but then has a player leave, taking them back below the required total?
The best way is how it is now. If a player can leave and take points with them then that will open an even bigger can of worms. Like someones ALT coming to my guild and leaves 5 min before end of event taking his points with him and also screwing the other 29. This has happened to many in Guild Wars already. If you have a player join mid week they already have disadvantage because if they miss each stage reward they have no way of getting it so basically they are just playing for the stages that are left and LB. This whole thread is about something that someone thought was happening which was not happening. If anyone tells you otherwise its basically Fake News.
#makemixergreatagain?
Does anyone of you had use all your altâs accounts and tell all your sisterâs guilds move up to do you a favor just get 1st place? Did you guys had done already? Is that why it pop up in your mind that thinking people would do that just for 500 Gems in reward? And the rest of the Sisterâs guilds get nothing? Example why donât anyone of you think what if you spent your gems to upgrade doom weapon +10 all those are over 70 sigils excluding Ravens. Then you canât even use all your sigils on your main account. So you think you have time to play other accounts? To me itâs not worth to spend 2285 gems to get 500gems in reward but people spent gems to upgrade weapon +10 for reason. Then yeah they can have a lot of sigils and worth almost the entire guild member would spent their gems to get their weapon to+10 then you donât need other accounts or sisters guild you still can win 1 st place with 30 people
I really do not know exactly what you are saying but some in game think they are Entitled to 1st place no matter what the event is or itâs reward. The Devs lower reward to 1 Gem it be same thing. Bragging rights I guess.
This thread is about people cheating by using sisterâs guild and altâs account to get them win 1st place. And the want the devs to do something. And my comment is to asked them if anyone of them had done it. Because I donât think anyone would do that. By the calculate of the first place of total Dooms 2100-2200. For 1st place. Which it possibly if the guild member doesnât 2285 gems that is 70+ sigils with 30 members it able to get 2200 dom.
So this thread was started by conjecture not facts. The DEVS have stated many times if you have proof of people cheating please send them the proof. I just want to say that I do not want to be contacted in game with complaints from a rival guild because I do not work for GEMS of War, Iâm a customer not an employee. I enjoy this mode of the game and some enjoy other modes.
@rojo they are definitely has no proof. But assuming. They probably warn the devs. And they tell the devs about other rival guild has been used sisterâs guild to use extra sigils in main guild. They donât believe anyone would spent 2850 gems for 500 in reward. Theyâre lucky didnât says my guild name who did. Otherwise I will report and complaint that theyâre recklessly report us without proof and that could damage our guild image.
Besmirch Birch?
Though It Would Be Cool As If We Could Start On A Day That Suited Us , Get A Bit Hard To total up Guild Points , Though They Could do it Monthly The Results You Know they are cool n always looking for suggestions . Especially clever ones like that enabling more people to play
This is ludicrous. Since this game mode was introduced we have had complaint after complaint and now we have got the totally expected finger pointing that is so prolific with certain individuals. Letâs start with basic maths. A well organised guild who scouts and communicates effectively and has a decent team can EASILY score in excess of 40 dooms with a weapon tier purchase each. 1200 dooms minimumâŚ1320 plus if you are on form. Any accusations are based on 1 issueâŚthe paranoid delusions of the guild who must be first. 1st doom was crying about rewards. 2nd doom they spent more to be P1 despite doom 1 complaint. Doom 3? We arenât buying victory so someone must be cheating by using the system WE HAVE come up with. Hilarious. However, it wasnât just one guild that gave them a scare so on what basis is the musical chair theory of multiple guilds founded? Before I forget, the guild making this accusation and thread have a âretirement guildâ with about 14 members in it. Nice place to spin your alts perhaps? So, in a nutshell itâs the same old story. If we win we will brag (without letting on how much it cost) about our âsuperiorityâ; if you get close you must be cheating even though we are the ones providing a method to do so. This guild seems to know every scam, scheme and exploit way ahead of anyone elseâŚso if you are getting close, their paranoid mindset conjures up that you must have discovered said exploitâŚnot be a better more organised guild. Itâs boring and repetitive and happens way too much with these individuals who out spend in most events to claim âvictoryâ. I look forward to your next installment
Do you actually like how the current rewards are structured? Donât look it as someone that gets 2nd, look at it from 99th place, or even just a guild that barely gets 12 stages done. Is that really something you like?
If you think 7-10th getting 75 gems is good, fair enough I guess.
This post was totally useless and you clearly just necro this thread to put oil on the fire.
Well said and you are absolutely correct. Could not have said it better myself. Nice work.
To be honest I donât really give much thought to the rewards structure; we knew what doom was offering from the get go so being savvy with a game plan to bag all rewards for minimal expense seemed the smart move to me. I would imagine that most in the top 10 follow this concept. Beyond that the reality is very different. Lower guilds without discord, guild clubs or any desire to interact in chat is the norm, not the exception. Therefore there is slim chance of these guilds obtaining all event rewards unless a good few buy much higher tiers to compensate for sigil haemorrhage throughout the guild. For most guilds, doom will be a frustration due to lack of any structure as mentioned. Thatâs on their heads. Doom is a great way to encourage guild interaction and teamwork but most players donât want anything to do with that. Anyone who has ever been in a non top 10 guild knows this all too well and doom has illustrated the shortcomings of gems of war whilst aiming to create a more cohesive approach. Your guild is without question well organised and many guilds could achieve much more with a similar approach. The vast majority of the playerbase has no inclination to do so, or to play wars correctly and thatâs another reason why veterans leave the game. If you want the rewards you need to graft in a guild that wants the same thing. Such guilds are extremely scarce. So the rewards are irrelevant at this stage because I can see doom being avoided by most players other than to buy the weapon. And thatâs a shame.
I didnât put oil on the fire. The individual initiating this thread did that single handedly. Do you really believe that accusing people of cheating YET AGAIN is going to achieve anything less than friction within the community? Exactly.
Holy walls of text Batman!
If you read truxton post again, you will notice he never mentionned the word âcheatingâ . He only bringed attention to the dev, saying there might be a way to take advantage of the event and he doesnât think it was fair to be able to do it.
We all know the event wasnât designed to be play that way and this is why truxton asked for a fix. Itâs the same thing than delve when people were able to get #1 rank and stick to lv 20, it wasnât fair for the people who were level 400+ and had trouble to finish delve
Regardless of whether specific terminology was or wasnât used, there is no denying what is actually intimated by this post. Itâs very clear and very unpleasant. I welcome an absolutely level playing field with a playerbase of integrity. Events should have capped buy in to promote a more competitive feel to the game. Devs would get more revenue because players might just go a tier or 2 more because they are in with a shout at the power orb rather than being bought out of contention by those with the time and the resources to outmuscle them week in week out. That would be nice; honest competition; what a novelty.
And then once all members of said guild finished their purchases they COULD rotate members of sister guilds or Alt Accounts to gain more advantage over the honest players or simply force them to do the same in order to stay competitive.
Look, regardless of your personal grudge with any guild that rubs you the wrong way, or not, as i explained at lenght the devs have a breach for exploitation in his event.
Regardless if the reasons behind this thread are fear/jealously/e-pe#1@ show-off or whatever you call it there is CLEARLY a breach.
I prefer the devs take care of it in the sense of avoiding any future problems that would threaten aâŚ
as you put. Is there any reason for you to be against any actions the devs take in this regard?