Seems that any feedback posted here is a time waste. Yet again in the new World Event with medals that increase skull damage there is almost ZERO TROOPS AND WEAPONS THAT GENERATE SKULLS
Are you trying to artificially prolong the time spent in the event battles?
I’m sure they read it. Maybe not all, but a large enough portion to know we would not like this. They just do it anyway. Why? It’s a mystery. I sure would love some insight into the process.
Maybe, like the battles, medals are randomly chosen?
The process must look like this:
They are sitting in a meeting room, high AF with a couple of wheels of fortune.
Then they decide that it will be a color and role restricted event, spin the wheel and make it happen.
Fortunately they were too stoned and can’t decide which role the wheel selected so they put both of them on the event.
Btw the only weapon which can help is the Doomed Axe.
Guess it might have to do something to do with scoring mechanism used by event… Stormheim also had t0 requirement to get all rewards done… and troop restrictions were cutting off all skull generators.
@Tibo if only substances we could use to get high were legal in Australia. Alas, they are not, so we don’t get high while designing events.
I have passed the feedback regarding this event on. I saw it mentioned here, and it was also brought up to me on stream. This feedback may or may not affect future events, but it has been read.
Acting on feedback versus reading or passing on feedback are different things.
Might it be that so little thoughts/effort is put into these events, Salty, just because people in general will do the events no matter what the devs comes up with?
I’d argue that there’s also passing on what the feedback that has been passed on has achieved, to allow those that take time and effort to write feedback to decide whether this is even remotely worth it. Even something as simple as “+” or “-” would help to make the feedback section appear less of a graveyard where community interaction goes to die.
How was that incendiary? It was an opinion of ones capabilities, that might be assumed by bringing the facts together. Aren’t we supposed to provide the feedback?