[Poll] How do you feel about the current Treasure drop rate?

Wanted to gauge the general climate on the forums about how everyone feels about treasure drops from portals based on their own personal experience.

Discounting rarity distribution within each set, how do you feel about how many treasures are dropping versus troops from portals?

  • I’d like more treasures to drop (meaning fewer troops)
  • I’d like more troops to drop (meaning fewer treasures)
  • Feels about right as of now
  • Don’t Care

0 voters

(Before it gets brought up, lets also assume for now there will never be a guild-guardian style system where troops get removed from the drop pool after you have mythic +4 on all of them in a given drop pool. “More troops at first but get only treasures if you don’t need any troops” is too easy and perfect a solution that would satisfy almost everyone to ever expect to happen)

Per request: How do you feel about troop drops from portal being “Guild Guardian” Style (once you have all of them in a faction at mythic+4, you don’t see them anymore, only treasures drop)

  • Yes, please
  • No, thanks
  • Don’t care

0 voters

1 Like

Liking for the “before it gets brought up” :joy:


So I hate all of the options and I can’t throw my vote into the guild-guardian style. Life is great.

If I want more treasure to drop, the average cost of shards to mythic all troops will rise. Lets say the loose estimate currently is 8k. That could easily jump to 10-12k, which then is compounded every 5 weeks… It adds up. Snce they haven’t done anything to make Delve 500 worth doing daily, it means the only people that benefit are the ones keeping a low level Delve since this whole faction system is made to punish people that actually attempt to play their game. There’s actually nothing promised here stating “more treasure” means “treasure actually worth using”. You can keep your gold rings and priest’s chalice.

Does it feel right about now? Lol no.

Do I want more troops to drop? … No. Sure, I’ll end up spending less shards to max all troops and that’s a plus, but then in the end, I still want treasure, even if I buy potions to do these events. I’ll end up wasting more shards in the long run trying to pad my treasure because I maxed my troops far too early.

Does it look like I don’t care?

What they could do is create a chaos portal option that only pulls treasures, or they can create a new method of releasing treasure outside of chaos portals. What’s wrong with rewarding treasure after each delve battle, with the different treasure rarity being equivalent to ingots?

Or… the guild guardian system, that would make everyone happier.


Assume “more troops” means significantly reducing not only the rate of gold rings (to about a third of current) but also roughly halving chalices and crowns, with lamps and sacred treasures getting about a 25-30% reduction (and purses dropping about 5% more).

Assume “more treasures” means “at the current ratios they are dropping”.

Assume no change means no change from current actual rates.

Assume that something probably will change in the near future, and there is some kind of uproar about it, which option is the least unappealing? Back to how it is now, more treasures, more troops, or don’t care?

At the risk of detracting from the real point, I went ahead and put another poll for that. I’m sure everyone will hate the idea and nobody will vote yes.

But yeah, I hope we end up here.


I’n the only one that answered no thanks to the faction troops following the guardian system​:rofl::rofl:

I’d rather have 100 copies of 4 troops than 400 copies of 1 troop, that’s my explanation.

1 Like

Seeing what I can choose from I went with “leave treasure drop rate as it is” and “yes-please-guardian-style”.

But, as most people understand, the underlying issue requires more complex plan to fix it. For example, while going guardian style drops sounds good on the paper and somehow gets introduced (just for the argument’s sake) it would absolutely beat the purpose of this change if removed faction troops got replaced by coin sacks and rings.

Risking some off-topic, this is so true:

Today I tried level 500 faction team at Warrens. The only tangible thing (other than being thrown bricks at) was three (yes, you heard it right - the immense amount of 3) chaos shards. So, how much time do I need, at this rate, to be able to raise hoard by one level?

It’ll never happen, but I wouldn’t mind if the treasures followed the guild guardian method as well. 505 can keep their sacks of copper coins and bronze rings. I only use the silver chalices when I’m low on crowns…

Yeah, I’m still bitter about my 353 ASE Hoard. Potions, bah humbug.

For those asking for a guild-guardian system, it’s never ever going to happen. Period, full stop. You’re asking for an “Old GoW” solution to the issue. Those days are long gone and never coming back.

Crossposting, @Ashasekayi states the situation well:

As has been stated multiple times on this board, the devs are 100% fully “in” to this model, with the whole 4.X patch series serving to rewrite the game’s core systems to adopt to their new direction for the game.

When Sirrian said a couple of dev Q/A streams ago that the next few streams were going to be focused on end-gamers, most thought that meant introducing new endgame content. And while that is technically correct, what he really meant was that these updates (which I believe are not done yet), were introducing new pain points for endgame players that can’t be overcome from the breadth of one’s roster and the depths of their resource accounts.

The core similarity between all of these changes is time. All of these new changes are designed to require endgamers to invest incredible amounts of time to make any significant progress at all. Any changes to reduce the amount of time or grinding needed to achieve progress in these new systems has a literal zero chance of being implemented.


@Lyrian, I don’t think anyone was asking, just hoping. Rebellions were built on hope. Allegedly. Way to crush my fantasy. Thanks.

It took me a second to realize what the ‘slider bar’ for Elite Level Mythic upgrades, but I would vote for that over the current gambling percentage. And be told shortly thereafter it would never happen either…

It needed to be said.

The devs, to date, appear to be quite happy with both the insufficient drop rate of shards to pull treasures, as well as the scarcity of any meaningful treasures that appear from chaos shard pulls. The issue can be resolved with adjustments to either mechanic.

But, for at least the last six months, they have not shown any willingness to budge on the matter. And I don’t see that stance changing anytime soon.

Well, I guess everybody wants to talk about the “guild guardian style drops” thing.

Implementing a “guild guardian” style system for treasure drops (at the current drop ratios) won’t even help as much as people think, but it would be a huge boon to the overall “flow” of the system.

Right now, since rares generally hit mythic last, a guild guardian-style “cut all troops” system would only be accessible after dropping roughly 8k shards into a given kingdom (~400 portal pulls). I’ve calculated the current average xp per portal drop at roughly 31.85xp per portal opened (keep in mind this could drop significantly in the near future for reasons stated below). That gives us approximately 12470 xp after just mythicing our troops, for 8k shards. Enough to get to roughly hoard level 158 on average. This is also enough shards to require at least some participation in delve events with full daily farming clears, or heavy participation and shop purchases and some kind of constant progress.

Right now, if we went above and beyond, and spent, say, 12k shards on any given faction, while hitting the mythic treshold +4 at 8k, our average expectation of xp would be 19110, enough total xp to take a single hoard to about level 195. If we do the same calculation assuming guardian style drops (again, based on current treasure rates and ratios, full treasure drops would me avg 57.74 xp per portal), we’d get 24,288 xp. We’d be looking at roughly hoard level 210. Keep in mind this assumes you use every treasure, and regardless expect a huge amount of extra gold cost for those last 15 levels. In reality, if you can’t beat a faction at 195, you probably can’t at 210, either, but people might be more inclined to seek out those shards to push just a little bit farther if they are just a bit more effective.

The whole chaos shard system has two diminishing return points - the overall “value” of a shard with respect to significant items it can pull (treasures + troops, then the troop half the drop pool becomes “worthless” after you mythic them and we only have treasures) the amount of value you get from the things you get from the shards (you need more treasures and more gold to raise hoard levels, and the gold cost itself is another diminishing returns system). Lets also keep in mind that Chaos Shards are a gated resource only available through limited entry systems in an of itself, so there is no way to accelerate off a set timetable without also a significant amount of resource investment (as well as time).

Simply put, you can make a satisfactory diminishing returns system and keep almost everybody on a consistent reward schedule of a fairly small range without the introduction of “zeros” into your reward tables. Hoard levels already go up to level 1000 (>500k xp), a single one of which is already impossible to reach with all the treasures obtained on any given account since delving was introduced over a year ago, so any increase in the ability to get treasures after you have already completed every faction troop to mythic just translates to the ability to gain a small amount of stat points with an absurd amount of effort or real time waiting, or a combination of both. Making a small amount of stat points available for an absurd amount of extra effort and/or real-time waiting seems right on point with this series of updates.

The likely reason it “won’t happen” is because they are, for some reason, locked into the mentality that “if we do this, it will make things too easy and allow people to accelerate past the schedule we have laid out”. And by that I mean, I don’t think level 500 faction teams (for most delves) are for the most part even supposed to be beatable without just throwing yourself at them over and over or buying your way past them. Theres now a ton of ways to raise your stats a bit that, when you combine them all, raise your chances of getting a good run, but its still a banging head on wall situation for a lot of them. This amount of stat differential won’t even put a dent in any pace of these current systems while appeasing the people that want to put in 20 times the effort for 2% more of the gain. Theres very little downside here, even coming from the angle of “we want this to occupy x amount of time”.

And now I’ve gone in derailed my own thread.

Anyways, as some of you might have guessed, the reason I’m bringing this up in the first place is because treasure drop preview rates for portals aren’t even close to what we are getting now (and never were). Reading between the lines based on the information I’ve received, when the issue is “corrected” (which will happen eventually whether or not I press the issue now, just like with tributes someone will notice randomly, and I want to get everyones opinions out now before a change is made), it will likely result in the rates being hastily adjusted to the rates displayed.

Currently, we are getting over 50% overall treasures rate (current state stated 30%), and the rate of the total drop pool of each treasure is dropping higher than the stated rate in nearly all cases (we are currently getting about ~3x gold rings, ~2x chalices, 1.5x crowns, ~1.3x crowns/sacred treasures, lamps and gold rings are pretty close to the stated rates). The ratios within the treasure pool now significantly favor gold rings, though. The avg xp per portal pull at the stated rates would be about 21.075 (though if this is done and guild guardian style drops are implemented, we get 70.25 avg xp per portal pull after everything is mythic +4, and mythic +4 becomes easier). My estimate for shards to get mythic +4 all under the new rates wouldn’t change much (avg expectation of 10 legendary copies would be just over 7140 - rounded to 7200, since almost nobody does draws of 1, significantly more than the others for these drop rates, so thats our average benchmark). Using this paradigm, our average xp 7200 shards would be 7587 - enough for hoard level 122. An additional 4.8k shards (total 12k) under the “true rate” would leave us at 12645 xp, about hoard level 159, roughly where we get now for spending 8k… so you’d have to push 50% harder for the same exact outcome as now using “true rates”. If we used those additional 4.8k shards on this same faction with the “guardians rule” in effect, we’d get a total of 24447… hoard level of about 211 - roughly the same place we get now for spending 12k shards with “Guardian Rule” with the current drop rates. Either way, you have still have to push way harder to have this many extra shards per month and overcome the diminishing returns for gold as well.

If they see this and nerf the rates to the “true rates” without adding anything to counterbalance they are effectively making a decision to make things harder for people that are already complaining it is too hard. So if this is done, the best way would be to accompany it with the “guild guardian drop system” boost - a treasure nerf for casuals looking to just get the troops or mythic them while only slightly reducing the amount of shards they would need to reach either of these goals; and in the same range of total treasure xp value for hardcore players, more if they pull 12k shards per month (keeping in mind treasure xp required does not scale linearly with hoard levels, so that significantly more xp isn’t that much more stats). Thus, the overall timetables for any given goal remain safe while creating an environment that feels less “wasteful”.

I was going to make this argument after I showed my full math on just how far off everything is right now related to the portal drops, but I guess now is a good a time as any to bring it up.

As a heads up, I probably will end up forcing the issue soon because the existence of a completely incorrect (like, not even close) drop rate display when it has been vehemently stated (multiple times, and now again recently) to be configured from the same data the server uses for drops could be indicative of a larger problem (but hopefully just the wrong table is being displayed). Also, historically, if they do notice before the issue is forced they will probably, summarily and without warning, change the drop rates behind the scenes to match the rate displays and not the other way around, won’t do a news post until they get called out for doing this, and be impervious to any discussion about changing the rates because it was a “bug the whole time”. I sincerely hope that doesn’t happen. So sorry in advance for any nerfs that come from this (but I’ll totally take credit for the buffs).

tl;dr: Regardless of what the actual treasure rates end up as, Guild Guardian style treasure drops would be a good way to facilitate small stat growths with huge effort that is right in line with deeds(l15 kingdoms)/medals/elite levels.

Smallest actionable feedback (If any devs happen to be reading this): If you have all troops in a faction at mythic +4, only treasures will drop there. In terms of overall delve levels, and therefore stat gains, this will convert to, the effect is relatively minor, it would compound nicely with other recent systems, while appeasing a great deal of players, especially if something happens to be nerfed…


Posts such as the above make me wish we had the ability to declare regions inside them (C# style), and the ability to like regions independently of each other.

Because I would like every single paragraph of the above post separately if I had the option, to drive home how much I agree with the statements made.