This will be inevitable as everyone will use the most meta team in the end. I would suggest randomize the color of the keep each day to give some variety so like the old wars, you would need to set 4 defenses for the week.
2 Likes
Or they could, you know, remove Chrysantherax from pvp defenses just like stellarix. But they wont because these devs are out to lunch
5 Likes
how many bugs with all these QOL changes can we expect, b/c we all know the devs dont play the game, they are too busy screwing it up
6 Likes
I suggested something like we donāt select a colour for the defense.
Gate
First line : Kingdom
Second line : Race + Colour
Third line : Race
Palace : anything
With a penalty - like the old system - for using multiple of the same troop. The defenses can change and give us more variety. The more you progress towards the palace, the more difficult the fights become.
I was actually quite decent at GW.. This is an absolute RNG fest though. Exactly like you said Suncrest vs EoE, Tak x3.. Or TRM, tak, tak, beetrix.. Or Chryssy with obsidian libram..
There has so be some sort of restriction to 1 troop, or ban Tak, stella, Diamintina, Chryssy. Make it about somewhat of skill again.. my only losses every week is straight RNG turn 2 fills and 3x hitting the right gem the next turn.
A story on why your dev team MUST act to balance their game for a change @Jeto This is not a fair matchup. Its not a āgit gudā scenario.ā Beating it is pure luck. First battle i lasted 3 turns second battle went like this.
this is my second turn.
Takshaka is a double zuul that fills fast. When we have to use teams that need setup this is not rng. Its plain not fair. This is honestly one of the worst game modes thats ever been put in the game. Its lazy, its boring, and it is broken.
REMOVE THE ABILITY TO SET MORE THAN ONE OF THE SAME TROOP IN GUILD WAR DEFENSE.
5 Likes
No. Straight up ban the ability to use two troops in guild wars defenses. All this is on meta zones is pvp but you have to use a lesser team
3 Likes
or ban Tak, stella, Diamintina, Chryssy.
I donāt agree with that, I think they should be allowed Stellatrix, and check the troops previously downgraded (Ishbaala 40% instead 50%). These are 2 examples of troops that are banned or downgraded that isnāt necessary now.
We have lot of troops itās the shame if we cannot use them, but we need a balance between attack and defence.
No. Straight up ban the ability to use two troops in guild wars defenses. All this is on meta zones is pvp but you have to use a lesser team
This is probably the easiest way, to give a ban than take the risk some players sacrifice their score to stop the guild in front (probably the difference of points by the opponents loosing will be bigger than some players losing some points by a penalty).
Note : with a team with Tak in first I play with Garuda in first position, doesnāt mean I win unfortunately
3 Likes
You typed all English but I have no idea what you are saying
My 2 messages are modified and I hope you understand now 
1 Like
Thanks! Makes sense now.
1 Like
Duplicate troops in teams is something I have been discussing with the team to address.
Same with attack restrictions.
I just donāt have any confirmed changes, plans or information yet, that can be shared.
9 Likes
Attack restrictions could be with different league in GW.
This would allow for leagues with fewer restrictions for those who want them and leagues with higher restrictions for guilds who take GW seriously.
1 Like
Jeto, still the same active bug, did not receive the gold marks from yesterdayās GW victory day, in the mailbox, while other members of my guild received them, the victory screen did not appear on my account, will it be sent manually or each player in my case, must make a complaint ticket? it may be a lot of tickets to process, thank you for a quick resolution response.
There is a somewhat controversial approach that might work out better, banning all mythic troops and mythic weapons from Guild Wars. This would prevent most of the crazy teams that tend to win battles on the first turn(s). Fights would obviously take longer, which is likely a positive, because it allows for far more strategies than right now.
1 Like
Do you mean all weapons, so it would be the much unplayed and dislikes Arena.
Or do you mean mythic weapons, Iām guessing you didnāt mean this, as weād still have wand .
Iād love to only use , legendary and below troops, and epic and below weapons.
But obviously like most the playerbase, Iād hate Arena.
It was removed for a reason 
Ps. Canāt ban weapons, thereās then no use to classes.
2 Likes
Next guild wars red restriction? Thatās disappointingly easy. By the way, I beat all those meta teams you guys are whining about with a suncrest team, just like the previous restricted guild wars, with maybe 1 inevitable loss once in a blue moon, but whatās the fun when there is no danger of losing?
3 Likes
@Jeto - similar to that mentioned above, I did not receive day 4ās GW rewards. It would be appreciated if you could look into (as I thought the fix had been done).
1 Like
This one. Updated to post to make it clearer.
The wand should really be a mythic weapon, similar to the other special ones that can be crafted.
If they had bothered to add rewards remotely useful for players it might have been a lot more popular.
3 Likes
Honest truth I liked it
Because it was random troop, my issue with it , was the no weapon.
They should of had a random epic and below weapons, then Iād of played it lots.
Any mode with no weapons, means no classes. So itās not inline with the game lore.
Of kingdoms and heros, so I hate it 