Replace Chrysantherax in PvP and Guild Wars

We don’t fight Stellarix in PvP . Chrysantherax doesn’t need to loop. It’s one-shot kill.

This exactly. Chrysantherax is eligible in PvP and Guild Wars. Chrysantherax dwarfs Stellarix. It’s bizarre that we need to point this out to the devs.

Use a monolith for spell reduction

1 Like

Yeah, those are helpful but We shouldn’t need to do that. Every other team has Chrysantherax insta’killing

1 Like

Yeah, right.

And don’t forget a tag-team with Mistmother.

It does more dmg than you can absorb.

I could agree with you on the subject, logically, chrysanterax should be removed same way as stellarix was. Disagree on the pay to win tag though, I have never bought anything, VIP 0, and got chrysantherax first day, with 9k dragonite left. And im not the only one.

I have played since dragonite was introduced, not sure how you have so much of it. Maybe 1 perfect a month. Rare gnome drops in playing. Plus event rewards. It does not add up to those amounts. I had 5 K going into the cosmics and that was with getting the last set in 7 eggs. The first set took 21.

1 Like

Spell reduction only helps in PvP, not in GW.

Anyway, if Stellarix is replaced then logically Chrysantherax should be too. I’m still of the opinion that it was a massive mistake to have replaced Stellarix in the first place. It was a bandaid fix for other problems.

There’s also speculation based on spoilers of a new GW system that’ll help combat looping, but it’s not here now. It seems like the perfect time to utilize their temporary bandaid fix of replacing troops. What harm is a few months for Chrys? Stellarix has been replaced for 296 days (almost 10 months) now.

1 Like

if gow dont stop the floral boss dragon Chrysantherax in pvp and gw in the defense teams then you might as well bring back stellarix and the wand of stars, all 3 of these troops/weapon is far too strong for both events in defense and offence in gw even endgamers plus low levels are finding that Chrysantherax is too much a beast and most players right now dont have this boss. gow make it very difficult to get chrysantherex unless you are extremely lucky to get all 6 floral dragons with out get numerous duplicates. Gow dont even give players a chance to buy this troop for real cash. so that being said, devs need to remove chrysantherax from all pvp defense and in gw defense and offence like stellarix and wand of stars

I’m not the person you were talking to but I have an alt that I’ve had for just about a year. I haven’t spent one penny on that account. And it’s maybe a week or two away from being done with all 3 sets of dragons. I get the dragonite every day from the dungeon offers. It does require some rather OCD collecting of tributes, but it’s doable.

ETA: Oh, and also doing PVP for the marks

Doesn’t make any sense why Stellarix is replaced in PvP/GW but Chrysantherax is not.
Maybe devs will realise this eventually but it seems there are only a handful of them running this game now :neutral_face:

1 Like

Diamantina: 6 + 2x
Stellarix: 6 + 3x
Chrys: 6 + 3.25x (presumed)

I don’t actually have Chrys to confirm its damage output, but it really does not appear significantly higher than Stella’s (who, by contrast, was significantly stronger than Diamantina).

For reference, these numbers are correct

1 Like

Buying dungeon and spending gold marks, I can see why someone would have enough. But, many use gems for other purposes and gold marks for books. Just getting ‘free’ dragonite is slim pickings.

It’s nowhere as near as strong in GW’S and the mononliths actually worked last GW’S apparently, only 1 shots in frenzy zones and don’t have the looping ability Stellarix has

1 Like

It has looping potential

Sorry, was speaking from my own experience. It doesn’t one-shot me even in frenzy. Its lower spell damage resistance and lesser looping ability makes it easier for me to stop it casting again than Stellarix.

I tend to die more often to Diamantina than Chrys, due to unlucky skull cascades from Diamantina’s bonestorm.

1 Like

The monoliths indeed did work but it was confirmed to be a bug.

1 Like