Guild Wars Unbalanced

Feature Requests and Game feedback
1

Good afternoon,

I know Guild Wars was already recently visited but seriously could use another look at balancing… There is no WAY a Rank 19 guild should be going against a Rank 1. This unbalanced match making is killing Guilds with less players or with more lower levels trying to get them to keep playing this game. Most of my lower guild members can not even get 5 wins to try and get the rewards due to being too weak to even take out the Gate of the Top 5 guilds and killing their interest in even taking part in Guild Wars.

4 Likes
2

Both guilds have the same troops.

Both guilds can post same defences.

It’s not real PvP against a guild.

It’s based on, rng. Starting boards, how the boards drop, were takshaka puts it’s gems.

Every explode, every move which changes the board is rng.

There’s minimal skill in the playing.

Every moves causes rng of the next columns on the board.

Even we’re you said you couldn’t get past a area, there’s 5 defence teams. And it’s rng which team , everyone fights each round lol.

This game is 99.9 percent rng. The only part not rng is you entering your card details.

Every vk, every key, every battle, everything of everything is rng :joy:

4 Likes
3

You are right that both guilds get same troops and such.. however top 5 guilds have mostly high level players while lower ranked guilds don’t. You obviously are a higher level player where it doesn’t really matter what strength guild you play against. New and Low level players usually have a hard time even being able to compete against guilds higher in ranks. Level 19 vs Level 1 ranked is a no contest for the ranked 1 as their gate usually is over 12k power while Level 200 and lower players have a hard time getting to that. If they have Ranks they should at least make it a more even match up within close range of where the guild is ranked.

3 Likes
4

Dude yes I’m level 1798

But I’m in a guild ranked 63.

I’m the highest level, based on what you think, I’d be paragon every month. I make the teams, I test the teams in PvP and E16. I only post teams that get 8 out of 10 wins.

So based on what you think, we’d be ranked in order of level. But we’re not.

We’ve had a paragon in the 1300s. Because even if every player uses same team on attack and defence.

The RNG decides the win. No one can determine, were gems explode, were tak or Stella leave gems, when an effect takes place, when a frozen wears off, or the next line of coloured blocks that drops on the game board.

Your losing because of RNG, not because your s lower rank.

Your looking for reasons, excuses, and a answer why.

When it’s factually rng. If every player can pick the same defences and attacks. You’ve lost to a higher guild, but rng determines you lose to lower guilds to.

I know I can’t change your way of understanding the game, but just try and look at the evidence.

On Thursday I lost in fairy ring to a lower team,lower player. Because he used Ruby, and it self looper 4 times. That’s not s level, or a troop, or a board issue. It’s just RNG.

3 Likes
5

To try and explain it simpler.

You could put 10 consoles together.

Get 10 accounts, all same level, pick ten same teams, play the same opponent, with all ten accounts.

As soon as you start each accounts battle, all boards are different .

You can do every move the same, with all ten accounts. But all outcomes will be different.

1 Like
6

What system do you play on… Lol… Switch doesn’t have very many full guilds high ranked except the competitive ones. and I highly doubt a level 200 could beat your team… RNG does decide but only so much.

1 Like
7

TO TRY AND EXPLAIN IT TO YOU SIMPLER.

A LEVEL 200 and a LEVEL 1798 RNG DOES NOT MATTER.

YOUR TROOPS AND KINGDOM LEVELS WILL BE FAR SUPERIOR.

1 Like
8

Xbox.

The system doesn’t change the RNG. Again your looking for reasons that don’t exist.

Hopefully you can come to s happy medium, with the game.

9

So your guild ranked 19 is only level 200.

And the guild ranked 1, is over 1700. That’s what your saying. If your not saying that, I don’t know were the rank 200 comes into it.

No I’d be surprised if a rank 200 beat me, but I can guarantee a rank 1300 could beat me. With RNG

10

That is my point… Switch has VERY FEW full guilds compared to XBox. My guild ranked 19 and most guilds around my rank have lower level players in it and a Rank 1 vs Ranked 19 (Guild wars rank) is way to big of a gap for it to be a fair fight based on RNG.

1 Like
11

Bro. But you said level 200. Not lower ranks.

If your rank is 1300 , you can beat a 2200. It happens all the time.

So yea your rank 19, I can’t believe there’s many players less than 1300 in your guild.

You using 200 was an extreme, but it’s not based on your guild really.

12

lol make a switch toon and you will see that once you fall off the to 10 guild wars ranked guilds that levels drop since we do not has as many active players. I am over 1500 and Yes I know RNG plays a huge part in it. All about if you get a 4match to start the battle, or if your freeze hits the right target. Yesterday I got destroyed by 3tak +EOE setup.. Today I destroyed the same setup due to RNG.

1 Like
13

Listen you think you lost to a rank 1 guild, because of lvl and skill. It was RNG.

When you lose to the rank 20 guild below you, again it won’t be level or skill. It’ll be RNG. But you’ll still think it’s a level issue.

Good look with coming to terms with the gems of war RNG, I hope your a new player, because if your years into this game and still don’t understand it. You’ve z lot of misery left. :joy:

14

lol it is you who doesn’t understand… the old way of guild wars was still RNG but they had the brackets of how high or low you could go better… This one is just so far out that it is unbalanced.

2 Likes
15

Virikas level 1500 lol. You can beat everyone.

When you lose it’s RNG.

Iv beat triple tak, iv lost to triple tak.

People have beat my triple tak defence, they’ve lost to my triple tak defence. I give up with that argument.

There is no argument, while every team can post same defences. And same attacks. The argument isn’t viable over guild wars. Because we all do the same. No guild has a advantage or disadvantage. It’s pure RNG.

What you lose to, so do the guild your fighting.

Good evening. Iv tried.

16

LOL I have no issue with who I play against. I held my own vs rank 1.. BUT AGAIN TO GET IT THROUGH YOUR THINK SKULL… my guild has ALOT of lower levels in it because SWITCH does not have enough active high level players. You really think that a guild full of lower levels could bet YOUR current guild.. I was not talking about my battle outcomes.. Was talking about the guild score. When a player can not even beat the gate because they simply do not have good enough troops or power to compete RNG means nothing.

1 Like
17

The old way is dead, iv slept since then.

It’s not coming back, plus it was dumb. Book teams, book teams, book teams. Every defence the same.

Dumb,dumb,dumb. But still RNG. Lol the game is,was and forever will be RNG. You won old guild wars through RNG. You lost because RNG.

Or can you forsea the future, of every block drop on the board :joy:

18

God you are really a moron. Have fun living in your fantasy world where you think a level 200 or lower only looses to a high level player because of RNG.

1 Like
19

Dude. The reason isn’t the ranking.

The reason is, your guild accepts players to low then. You keep stating level 200. You must have at least 6 members that low you use it so much. guild wars no matter what guild you fight. The low players will lose lol.

This argument your trying to make. Is weird.

20

Yep I’m a moron cheers lol.

Yet you keep stating 200 level.

How about a screenshot of all your guild members ranks.

Cos I think your using 200 as an extreme. And it’s BS :joy: