These are still helpful.
I’m not getting as even of a distribution on task types as I had hoped based on a basic task type count to proceed with an “equal weighting of each task type within each rarity” assumption. This could be due to low sample size, or it could be indicative of weighting toward or away from certain types, and I’d like to get a clearer picture.
This also means I have to go back over the data again and input task types as well as rarities and expand my table. Probably won’t get a chance until about Thursday (the two week mark, for the people posting since the thread went up) after which I’ll have a better idea if more data would significantly impact the outcome of estimates.
