01.08.2019.
02.08.2019.
03.08.2019.
04.08.2019.
Aug 5, Day 26
Acct 1-(disregard top)
Acct 2-(disregard top)
Acct 3-
Acct 4-
Sneak peek of type ratios within rarities as recorded (through end of week 3) from the “all” set:
Still needs more verification, but this is enough to show that there is likely bias within the task types in any given rarity. (and some of this is going to skew things quite a bit)
Oh, and the K150s have been dipping below 5% here and there. Maybe my 5% estimate wasn’t so far off.
2 Likes
- August 2019
Interesting developments here, these are now very close:
Granted, daily now makes up most of the all set (currently about 83% of all recorded data is from “daily” contributors in unbroken sets) rather than it being split almost 50/50 between daily contributors and others as it was at about the end of week 1, but I think we are starting to get a clear picture of appearance rates though.
Next up is the sheet that calculates the total average weekly value of the table based on recorded task type ratios in each of the sets versus “assumed equal weighing” in both sets. I should have time to fix that up in the next couple days.
(you may keep posting and I’ll keep adding it. task type ratios could still use better resolution)
6 Likes
- August 2019
Aug 6, Day 27
Acct 1- Disregard top
Acct 2- Disregard top
Acct 3- Disregard top
Acct 4- Disregard top
- August 2019
