# What are the most popular suggestions, that will never be included?

**URL:** https://community.gemsofwar.com/t/what-are-the-most-popular-suggestions-that-will-never-be-included/73444
**Category:** Feature Requests and Game feedback
**Created:** [December 20, 2021, 8:38am UTC](https://community.gemsofwar.com/t/what-are-the-most-popular-suggestions-that-will-never-be-included/73444 "2021-12-20T08:38:50Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 24

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Jonathan](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/user_avatar/community.gemsofwar.com/jonathan/32/66724_2.png) [@Jonathan](https://community.gemsofwar.com/u/Jonathan)
#### Post date: [December 22, 2021, 10:12am UTC](https://community.gemsofwar.com/t/what-are-the-most-popular-suggestions-that-will-never-be-included/73444/24 "2021-12-22T10:12:20Z")

</div>

> [@kamosloki](#):
>
> Oh and the ability to mark certain troops as ‘favourite’ and sort by that

Yeah, this was definitely long-requested.

> **I would have also liked to see a 'Sort by: Newest/Oldest' option.**
>
> - A new or mid-game player opens a bunch of keys, gets a bunch of new troops, but misses seeing or can’t remember what they all were
> 
> - For reminiscing’s sake, you could see what your first pulls were!!
> 
> Less relevant now, since the search has somewhat improved, although maybe I’m just more familiar with all the troops and how to find things, but I think I also would have liked the ability to set two filters at once, whether text or otherwise.
> 
> - E.g. maybe I want to search within all troops with the Stoneskin trait to see if any also have Necromancy, or Impervious, or \_\_\_\_\_\_\_ (and I’m not already familiar with them all and don’t want to click on every one)
> 
> I think it’s kind of funny that I’m speaking in past tense – just seems very unlikely that these would be implemented at this stage.

> [@kamosloki](#):
>
> Providing a way to farm writs, Imperial deeds or books of deeds

I agree with all except this, maybe, or within certain limits. Same with GAPs – I don’t agree with the current implementation, but I can probably see how the original was problematic.

I guess they ARE but very popular suggestions, though!

> [@kamosloki](#):
>
> Although based on the medals experience it would work out cheaper to just use the lower level treausres…

> **Maybe 🤷**
>
> I guess ideally it would use a resource other than Gold (e.g. hopefully Souls, being the Soulforge) as well as or just an inefficient conversion cost (e.g. 3-5 Gold Rings → 1 Priest’s Chalice, despite a chalice only having twice the XP and upgrade chance, so a 50%-150% loss). Coin Purses and Gold Rings are detrimental for anyone but the newest of Delvers to use, so pretty much _any_ inefficiency cost (not incl. Gold) would be better.
> 
> Maybe that’s why it would never get implemented, though. It was very clearly stated that the chance of getting a Legendary or Mythic from Legendary Tasks was just a little too problematic for the devs:
> 
> > [@Sirrian's Design Thoughts (Last 4.7 Epic Task Update)](https://community.gemsofwar.com/t/sirrians-design-thoughts-last-4-7-epic-task-update/59858/1):
> >
> > After reviewing a LOT of data, we believe there was just TOO MUCH value tied up in the LT’s chance of Legendary/Mythic troops…
> 
> So for them, the more Gold it costs, and the more progress tied to Delve completion, the better, kind of. 😕

---

_[View the full topic](https://community.gemsofwar.com/t/what-are-the-most-popular-suggestions-that-will-never-be-included/73444)._