# TED-1000 should be of type Mech/Urska

**URL:** <https://community.gemsofwar.com/t/ted-1000-should-be-of-type-mech-urska/38268>\
**Category:** Feature Requests and Game feedback\
**Created:** [April 16, 2018, 8:50pm UTC](https://community.gemsofwar.com/t/ted-1000-should-be-of-type-mech-urska/38268 "2018-04-16T20:50:45Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 11\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Neight](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/54ee81/32.png) [@Neight](https://community.gemsofwar.com/u/Neight)\
**Post date:** [April 16, 2018, 8:50pm UTC](https://community.gemsofwar.com/t/ted-1000-should-be-of-type-mech-urska/38268/1 "2018-04-16T20:50:46Z")

</div>

Like, I almost think this should be filed under Bug Reports. DRACOS gets to be a Mech/Dragon,. Deep Borer is Mech/Dwarf, Shocktopus is Mech/Merfolk… even his flavor text says “Rise and Shine, Ursine!”

How is he not Mech/Urska?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Stan](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/user_avatar/community.gemsofwar.com/stan/32/29888_2.png) [@Stan](https://community.gemsofwar.com/u/Stan)\
**Post date:** [April 16, 2018, 8:53pm UTC](https://community.gemsofwar.com/t/ted-1000-should-be-of-type-mech-urska/38268/2 "2018-04-16T20:53:24Z")

</div>

If they did that, you might have two options if they ever run an Urska-based Invasion event. We couldn’t possibly have two Siegebreakers at the same time. That would break the game. [/s]

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Razzagor](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/user_avatar/community.gemsofwar.com/razzagor/32/50037_2.png) [@Razzagor](https://community.gemsofwar.com/u/Razzagor)\
**Post date:** [April 16, 2018, 9:10pm UTC](https://community.gemsofwar.com/t/ted-1000-should-be-of-type-mech-urska/38268/3 "2018-04-16T21:10:59Z")

</div>

Quoting Actreal:

> [@Tick Tock](https://community.gemsofwar.com/t/tick-tock/38225/31):
>
> I posit that Shocktopus has a Merfolk pilot, just as Deep Borer has a Dwarf pilot and Goblin Rocket has a Goblin pilot.
> 
> Dracos 1337 does appear to be an exception, but nevertheless:
> 
> Carnex is a Mech in the shape of a monster - no dual type
> 
> Clockwork Sphinx is a Mech in the shape of a specific monster - no dual type
> 
> I don’t think there’s a strong argument from precedent either way.

A cyborgue or “Half-Golem” Urska could be a Mech/Urska troop, but a mech shaped like a Bear is neither Urska or Beast.

But still there are some other strange dual troops like Totem Guardian which is a Wargare/Construct but i guess in this case there is a spirit inside the totem so it’s a Wargare. But well, this is just an explanation based on the possible lore behind the mechanics of races/types of this particular troop.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![awryan](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/user_avatar/community.gemsofwar.com/awryan/32/74650_2.png) [@awryan](https://community.gemsofwar.com/u/awryan)\
**Post date:** [April 16, 2018, 9:11pm UTC](https://community.gemsofwar.com/t/ted-1000-should-be-of-type-mech-urska/38268/4 "2018-04-16T21:11:51Z")

</div>

> [@Stan](#):
>
> If they did that, you might have two options if they ever run an Urska-based Invasion event. We couldn’t possibly have two Siegebreakers at the same time. That would break the game

Dammit Stan. I just came here to share the same epiphany. But to elaborate further. I bet originally he was designed to be Urska as well. But once they realized he could be summoned for every invasion event. They decided it’s best not to.

 ![Screenshot_20180416-160829](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/uploads/gemsofwar/original/3X/f/4/f4429ca812a0f65d0c0bcf90d0679e107dea38ee.jpg)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Neight](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/54ee81/32.png) [@Neight](https://community.gemsofwar.com/u/Neight)\
**Post date:** [April 16, 2018, 9:14pm UTC](https://community.gemsofwar.com/t/ted-1000-should-be-of-type-mech-urska/38268/5 "2018-04-16T21:14:09Z")

</div>

I think if you’re going to use up a spot just to hopefully get TED-1000, then you deserve to get him. Besides, you can already play with multiple seigebreaker troops, as long as you have more than one copy.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![awryan](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/user_avatar/community.gemsofwar.com/awryan/32/74650_2.png) [@awryan](https://community.gemsofwar.com/u/awryan)\
**Post date:** [April 16, 2018, 9:16pm UTC](https://community.gemsofwar.com/t/ted-1000-should-be-of-type-mech-urska/38268/6 "2018-04-16T21:16:08Z")

</div>

> [@Neight](#):
>
> Besides, you can already play with multiple seigebreaker troops, as long as you have more than one copy.

If you buy them from the shop. Yes.  
But if he was Urska… You could potentially use him with every Invasions event without buying that weeks Siegebreaker.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Neight](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/54ee81/32.png) [@Neight](https://community.gemsofwar.com/u/Neight)\
**Post date:** [April 16, 2018, 9:18pm UTC](https://community.gemsofwar.com/t/ted-1000-should-be-of-type-mech-urska/38268/7 "2018-04-16T21:18:29Z")

</div>

Sure, but the cost is you have to play with Urskayan Crown and then get lucky. I see no problem with that.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![awryan](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/user_avatar/community.gemsofwar.com/awryan/32/74650_2.png) [@awryan](https://community.gemsofwar.com/u/awryan)\
**Post date:** [April 16, 2018, 9:23pm UTC](https://community.gemsofwar.com/t/ted-1000-should-be-of-type-mech-urska/38268/8 "2018-04-16T21:23:02Z")

</div>

> [@Neight](#):
>
> Sure, but the cost is you have to play with Urskayan Crown and then get lucky. I see no problem with that

Not saying you’re wrong at all. And they do have a Raids boss that is Urska. Just my best guess though.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Nimhain](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/user_avatar/community.gemsofwar.com/nimhain/32/47049_2.png) [@Nimhain](https://community.gemsofwar.com/u/Nimhain)\
**Post date:** [April 17, 2018, 3:49am UTC](https://community.gemsofwar.com/t/ted-1000-should-be-of-type-mech-urska/38268/9 "2018-04-17T03:49:46Z")

</div>

We may consider this for the future.

_(But he’d be more mech/ beast than mech/ urska. Urska are humanoid bears, he’s more animal bear mech)_

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![awryan](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/user_avatar/community.gemsofwar.com/awryan/32/74650_2.png) [@awryan](https://community.gemsofwar.com/u/awryan)\
**Post date:** [April 17, 2018, 3:50am UTC](https://community.gemsofwar.com/t/ted-1000-should-be-of-type-mech-urska/38268/10 "2018-04-17T03:50:55Z")

</div>

> [@Nimhain](#):
>
> animal bear mech)

3 troop types for one troop in the future?  
Well… If you insist. Lol

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Neight](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/54ee81/32.png) [@Neight](https://community.gemsofwar.com/u/Neight)\
**Post date:** [April 17, 2018, 4:20am UTC](https://community.gemsofwar.com/t/ted-1000-should-be-of-type-mech-urska/38268/11 "2018-04-17T04:20:37Z")

</div>

Man/Bear/Pig?
