# REQUEST: Sort by base rarity

**URL:** <https://community.gemsofwar.com/t/request-sort-by-base-rarity/5179>\
**Category:** Feature Requests and Game feedback\
**Created:** [April 3, 2016, 1:05am UTC](https://community.gemsofwar.com/t/request-sort-by-base-rarity/5179 "2016-04-03T01:05:55Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DanWhatever](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/user_avatar/community.gemsofwar.com/danwhatever/32/3565_2.png) [@DanWhatever](https://community.gemsofwar.com/u/DanWhatever)\
**Post date:** [April 3, 2016, 1:05am UTC](https://community.gemsofwar.com/t/request-sort-by-base-rarity/5179/1 "2016-04-03T01:05:56Z")

</div>

I’d find this pretty useful as I often forget what is Rare and what is Ultra-Rare. I’ve foolishly ascended them mostly to Epic.

Thoughts?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tacet](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/user_avatar/community.gemsofwar.com/tacet/32/35_2.png) [@Tacet](https://community.gemsofwar.com/u/Tacet)\
**Post date:** [April 3, 2016, 1:09am UTC](https://community.gemsofwar.com/t/request-sort-by-base-rarity/5179/2 "2016-04-03T01:09:41Z")

</div>

Yeah, this feature would be very useful. I like to see which base legends are close to mythic so I know what event weeks to aim for, but all other non-base legends show as well.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Namour](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/user_avatar/community.gemsofwar.com/namour/32/2957_2.png) [@Namour](https://community.gemsofwar.com/u/Namour)\
**Post date:** [April 3, 2016, 1:47am UTC](https://community.gemsofwar.com/t/request-sort-by-base-rarity/5179/3 "2016-04-03T01:47:06Z")

</div>

Good idea.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jainus](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/user_avatar/community.gemsofwar.com/jainus/32/34949_2.png) [@Jainus](https://community.gemsofwar.com/u/Jainus)\
**Post date:** [April 3, 2016, 1:42pm UTC](https://community.gemsofwar.com/t/request-sort-by-base-rarity/5179/4 "2016-04-03T13:42:17Z")

</div>

Yep +1 for this…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mufasha](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/user_avatar/community.gemsofwar.com/mufasha/32/1327_2.png) [@Mufasha](https://community.gemsofwar.com/u/Mufasha)\
**Post date:** [April 3, 2016, 1:44pm UTC](https://community.gemsofwar.com/t/request-sort-by-base-rarity/5179/5 "2016-04-03T13:44:06Z")

</div>

Agreed said ten characters

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GemsCollector](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/b4bc9f/32.png) [@GemsCollector](https://community.gemsofwar.com/u/GemsCollector)\
**Post date:** [April 3, 2016, 2:14pm UTC](https://community.gemsofwar.com/t/request-sort-by-base-rarity/5179/6 "2016-04-03T14:14:33Z")

</div>

Nihil novi sub sole…  
A broader subject - unfortunately I don’t think devs addressed that issue ☹

> [@Quickly Identifying Base Rarity](http://community.gemsofwar.com/t/quickly-identifying-base-rarity/4279/15):
>
> That’s a good idea. I’d like “Base rarity” to be also added to sorting order options in Troops menu.

Of course +1 from me 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lyya](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/user_avatar/community.gemsofwar.com/lyya/32/3650_2.png) [@Lyya](https://community.gemsofwar.com/u/Lyya)\
**Post date:** [April 3, 2016, 3:20pm UTC](https://community.gemsofwar.com/t/request-sort-by-base-rarity/5179/7 "2016-04-03T15:20:59Z")

</div>

It would make it easier to efficiently disenchant, say, extra mythic copies of base ultra-rare and below troops, for those at that stage.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Serale](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/user_avatar/community.gemsofwar.com/serale/32/1081_2.png) [@Serale](https://community.gemsofwar.com/u/Serale)\
**Post date:** [April 3, 2016, 3:27pm UTC](https://community.gemsofwar.com/t/request-sort-by-base-rarity/5179/8 "2016-04-03T15:27:22Z")

</div>

I agree! It would be very useful!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Eika](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/user_avatar/community.gemsofwar.com/eika/32/103088_2.png) [@Eika](https://community.gemsofwar.com/u/Eika)\
**Post date:** [April 3, 2016, 3:29pm UTC](https://community.gemsofwar.com/t/request-sort-by-base-rarity/5179/9 "2016-04-03T15:29:26Z")

</div>

I agree, also it would be nice if every card had one of the small letters C-R-U-E-L for its base rarity in the corner, or so.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![actreal](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/user_avatar/community.gemsofwar.com/actreal/32/1945_2.png) [@actreal](https://community.gemsofwar.com/u/actreal)\
**Post date:** [April 4, 2016, 10:51am UTC](https://community.gemsofwar.com/t/request-sort-by-base-rarity/5179/10 "2016-04-04T10:51:46Z")

</div>

Agreed as an addition to the already available sort by (ascended) Rarity.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kzintiwife](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/user_avatar/community.gemsofwar.com/kzintiwife/32/2350_2.png) [@kzintiwife](https://community.gemsofwar.com/u/kzintiwife)\
**Post date:** [April 4, 2016, 1:51pm UTC](https://community.gemsofwar.com/t/request-sort-by-base-rarity/5179/11 "2016-04-04T13:51:25Z")

</div>

if a reverse option was put in, it could replace the z to a…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kraig10](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/ce73a5/32.png) [@kraig10](https://community.gemsofwar.com/u/kraig10)\
**Post date:** [April 8, 2016, 1:02am UTC](https://community.gemsofwar.com/t/request-sort-by-base-rarity/5179/12 "2016-04-08T01:02:00Z")

</div>

Sort by level, it’s not a prefect rarity filter, but not bad…in the meantime at least.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![benfrohlich](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/6bbea6/32.png) [@benfrohlich](https://community.gemsofwar.com/u/benfrohlich)\
**Post date:** [April 8, 2016, 6:25pm UTC](https://community.gemsofwar.com/t/request-sort-by-base-rarity/5179/13 "2016-04-08T18:25:31Z")

</div>

+1. I total agree.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AnalSwordfish](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/user_avatar/community.gemsofwar.com/analswordfish/32/9022_2.png) [@AnalSwordfish](https://community.gemsofwar.com/u/AnalSwordfish)\
**Post date:** [April 9, 2016, 12:35am UTC](https://community.gemsofwar.com/t/request-sort-by-base-rarity/5179/14 "2016-04-09T00:35:58Z")

</div>

I think you misunderstand OP’s request. Base rarity != Rarity reversed. Base rarity is rarity before ascensions.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kzintiwife](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/user_avatar/community.gemsofwar.com/kzintiwife/32/2350_2.png) [@kzintiwife](https://community.gemsofwar.com/u/kzintiwife)\
**Post date:** [April 9, 2016, 1:53am UTC](https://community.gemsofwar.com/t/request-sort-by-base-rarity/5179/15 "2016-04-09T01:53:54Z")

</div>

Not confused at all. It would be nice to have both features.

1. Remove z to a.
2. Add base rarity in its place and
3. Add a check box for reverse. It would a z to a, lvl 1 to 20, common the legendary current, common to legendary original, etc.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AnalSwordfish](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/user_avatar/community.gemsofwar.com/analswordfish/32/9022_2.png) [@AnalSwordfish](https://community.gemsofwar.com/u/AnalSwordfish)\
**Post date:** [April 9, 2016, 2:18am UTC](https://community.gemsofwar.com/t/request-sort-by-base-rarity/5179/16 "2016-04-09T02:18:49Z")

</div>

I see… still not sure why you even brought up A to Z in this thread then. Random…

> It would a z to a, lvl 1 to 20, common the legendary current, common to legendary original, etc.

Thanks for the examples of what “reverse” means. 😆

**EDIT** : By the way, I agree, both features would be nice to have. Hence why I ❤'d [your post about reverse sort](http://community.gemsofwar.com/t/reverse-button-on-sort/4111).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kzintiwife](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/user_avatar/community.gemsofwar.com/kzintiwife/32/2350_2.png) [@kzintiwife](https://community.gemsofwar.com/u/kzintiwife)\
**Post date:** [April 9, 2016, 2:34am UTC](https://community.gemsofwar.com/t/request-sort-by-base-rarity/5179/17 "2016-04-09T02:34:18Z")

</div>

I know that the devs look at how much screen space stuff takes up. On phones the sort list is really long. So by adding a reverse option, it allows for another entry in the list of sorts.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MakoSipper](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/user_avatar/community.gemsofwar.com/makosipper/32/1933_2.png) [@MakoSipper](https://community.gemsofwar.com/u/MakoSipper)\
**Post date:** [May 17, 2016, 3:21pm UTC](https://community.gemsofwar.com/t/request-sort-by-base-rarity/5179/18 "2016-05-17T15:21:47Z")

</div>

Not sure if this should be used as a different option from sort by current Rarity, but I’ve come to a point when all the troops are epic, legendary or mythic, and sorting by current Rarity doesn’t help at all.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Griswald](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/user_avatar/community.gemsofwar.com/griswald/32/27385_2.png) [@Griswald](https://community.gemsofwar.com/u/Griswald)\
**Post date:** [June 8, 2017, 12:10am UTC](https://community.gemsofwar.com/t/request-sort-by-base-rarity/5179/19 "2017-06-08T00:10:19Z")

</div>

Any plans to implement sorting by base rarity? Thank you!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tacet](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/user_avatar/community.gemsofwar.com/tacet/32/35_2.png) [@Tacet](https://community.gemsofwar.com/u/Tacet)\
**Post date:** [June 8, 2017, 1:44am UTC](https://community.gemsofwar.com/t/request-sort-by-base-rarity/5179/20 "2017-06-08T01:44:22Z")

</div>

We still need searches for:

- Inverse option for every option to reduce spam clicking
- Base Rarity
- Durability (HP+Armor)
- 2x Mana Types

[Next page](https://community.gemsofwar.com/t/request-sort-by-base-rarity/5179.md?page=2)
