# \[Not a bug\] Caribou's spelltext

**URL:** https://community.gemsofwar.com/t/not-a-bug-caribous-spelltext/83732
**Category:** Bug Reports
**Created:** [March 29, 2024, 10:46pm UTC](https://community.gemsofwar.com/t/not-a-bug-caribous-spelltext/83732 "2024-03-29T22:46:36Z")
**Posts on this page:** 2
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Stratelier](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/977dab/32.png) [@Stratelier](https://community.gemsofwar.com/u/Stratelier)
#### Post date: [March 29, 2024, 10:46pm UTC](https://community.gemsofwar.com/t/not-a-bug-caribous-spelltext/83732/1 "2024-03-29T22:46:36Z")

</div>

Okay, this is really just a wording issue, the spell’s actual effect is fine, but Caribou’s spelltext (as of its release today) says:

> [@Safety in Numbers](#):
>
> Create 8 Green Gems. Summon 0 - 3 more Caribou.

… Really, _zero_ to three? There has literally never been a summoner who is allowed to successfully summon zero troops – the preferred wording is instead “There’s a [\_\_]% chance to summon…”

Suggested wording for Caribou:

> [@](#):
>
> Create 8 Green Gems. There is a [\_\_]% chance to summon 1-3 more Caribou.

Where the stated % is the calculated probability of summoning a nonzero number of troops. (For example, assuming each value from 0-3 is equally weighted, this would be a 75% chance to summon)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Bramble](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/dfb087/32.png) [@Bramble](https://community.gemsofwar.com/u/Bramble)
#### Post date: [April 1, 2024, 10:10pm UTC](https://community.gemsofwar.com/t/not-a-bug-caribous-spelltext/83732/2 "2024-04-01T22:10:53Z")

</div>

Hello 🙂

This is not a bug, as you are able to summon 0 Caribou in the spell.

However, I have let the development team know about the feedback on the wording.
