# Let's All Agree to Save Our Gems

**URL:** https://community.gemsofwar.com/t/lets-all-agree-to-save-our-gems/29733
**Category:** Gameplay Chat (PC/Mobile)
**Created:** [September 4, 2017, 9:56am UTC](https://community.gemsofwar.com/t/lets-all-agree-to-save-our-gems/29733 "2017-09-04T09:56:13Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 58

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![efh313](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/user_avatar/community.gemsofwar.com/efh313/32/34349_2.png) [@efh313](https://community.gemsofwar.com/u/efh313)
#### Post date: [September 10, 2017, 3:25am UTC](https://community.gemsofwar.com/t/lets-all-agree-to-save-our-gems/29733/58 "2017-09-10T03:25:23Z")

</div>

I think there should be a flat reward for your bracket and then scaled rewards within.

So Bracket 1 awards ALL participants 500 gems  
Ranks then award additonal gems:

1- 500+500= 1000  
2- 400+500= 900  
3- 350+ 500 = 850  
4- 300+ 500 = 800  
5- 250+ 500 = 750  
6- 200+ 500 = 700  
7- 150+ 500 = 650  
8- 100+ 500 = 600  
9- 50+ 500 = 550  
10- 0 + 500 = 500

Then each Bracket can be tiered accordingly and there can be clear gains for WINNING your bracket as opposed to being in Bracket 2 and below and knowing your reward is the same regardless of placement. That is a big fail in the reward structure in my opinion.

Disclaimer: I in no way mean to say that my above example is balanced or accurate just an example. 😉

---

_[View the full topic](https://community.gemsofwar.com/t/lets-all-agree-to-save-our-gems/29733)._