# About those wisps **URL:** https://community.gemsofwar.com/t/about-those-wisps/30302 **Category:** Gameplay Chat (PC/Mobile) **Created:** [September 14, 2017, 11:02pm UTC](https://community.gemsofwar.com/t/about-those-wisps/30302 "2017-09-14T23:02:52Z") **Posts on this page:** 1 **Showing post:** 54
### Author: ![Lyya](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/user_avatar/community.gemsofwar.com/lyya/32/3650_2.png) [@Lyya](https://community.gemsofwar.com/u/Lyya) #### Post date: [October 6, 2017, 8:21pm UTC](https://community.gemsofwar.com/t/about-those-wisps/30302/54 "2017-10-06T20:21:07Z")
> [@Thegreyorc](#): > > giving freeze the rule that a only the troop is frozen As in, only deny an Extra Turn if the Frozen troop gained mana from the specified 4-match? I think that’d muddy the mechanics up way too much. Imagine a case where an unfrozen troop sits in front of a Frozen one of the same color. Would you say that a 5-match that spills a single point of mana over into the Frozen troop would be enough to deny the ET? What if you matched a 5-match and a 3-match in that turn, does the 5-match go to the first troop and the 3-match to the second (thus ET) or vice versa (thus no ET)? I get where you’re coming from, and in simple cases it makes sense that a troop untouched by collected mana would not impact the ET eligibility, but I think in practice it opens up too many edge cases to be practical. --- _[View the full topic](https://community.gemsofwar.com/t/about-those-wisps/30302)._